Plenary Talk
Eroding or Opening?
| Speaker: | ![]() |
Terrance E. Boult El Pomar Professor of Innovation and Security University of Colorado at Colorado Springs and CEO/CTO Securics Inc. |
Automated Video Surveillance has move from academic operating on small video
streams with component level algorithms into successful company
products. As
has happened in many of the electronics areas, leading companies in
surveillance have more funding, more Ph.D.s, more data and more facilities,
than even the best university research labs. As a maturing subfield, its
natural to ask if the opportunities for research in surveillance is eroding
there are there openings left? Well, as any vision/image process student
knows, erosion is the first step of opening. This talk will argue there
are many openings, and that they exists at every level of surveillance
problems: from sensors to low-level processing to high-level analysis.
We highlight a few very different directions where we
see more open space ahead.
The first part of the talk briefly discusses the the Nobel prize winning
Economic theory of asymmetric information, the "market for lemons" and
Kerckhoffs' principles for security. The economic theory tell us the real
answer to if the field will be eroding or opening depends on how we address
these issues. The talk then discusses the role of academic, and industrial
research, in light of these issue and gowning need to improve quantitative
evaluation standards and call for a more formal set of benchmarks, and
possibly standards for surveillance systems.
The second part of the talk addressees another view where we believe
there is
significant growth potential: balancing surveillance with privacy. The talk
briefly points out some of the excellent work from others in this area and
reviews a little of our privacy-enhancing camera work. It wil include issues
in biometric surveillance.
The last part of the talk will talk about the next sensor/architecture
revolution in surveillance, multi-mega pixel or gigapixel smart sensors. We
exaplin why we believe these paridigm shits are inevitable. While the major
persistent surveillance programs, because of the large size and potentially
sensitive data, may be dominnated by large industrial contractors, we
believe
there are still plenty of openings for both fundamental and applied
research.
The talk will also discusses a bit of what you'll need to know play and
maybe
to help recognize the opportunities when they are staring you in the
face. We
give example of how the new paridigm makes some old ideas/problem, with a
twist, new again.
